I’ve written about my distaste for FOSS zealotry before, but man when Steve died the big guns came out. In their writing about Steve Jobs’ death and how good it is that we are now rid of his influence, Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond have shown once again that they are just as tyrannical, if not more so, as they accuse Steve of being. Steve never suggested that Linux (I refuse to call it GNU/Linux) users are “wrong”. And he didn’t tell Windows users that they were “evil”.
I used to have respect for Eric Raymond. If it wasn’t for his piece on How to be a Hacker I never would have discovered Python. His The Cathedral and the Bazaar essay convinced Netscape to open-source their browser (although I’ve always felt that was an act of desperation because they were getting their lunch eaten by Internet Explorer, not because of some deep-seated sense that it was “right”).
The holier-than-thou attitude is one reason I chose to put myself into this “prison” as they call it. I wasn’t coerced. I didn’t do it because it was cool. I tried it for myself and found the experience to be vastly superior to any of the Linux distros I had ever tried. It was so much better, in fact, that I “converted” most of my family and some of my friends. The diminished support burden on me was worth it. I can still do everything on the Mac that I was doing on Linux. I can still install and run the software of my choosing. Apple has not taken away any of those freedoms. And those are the ones that actually matter to real people.
When will the free software zealots realize that real people have enough to worry about and don’t really care if they can see the source code or open the box and hack away? People are not programmers.
Most people could not compile a program from source code, just like most people could not construct a chair out of a block of wood. The choice of software freedom is inapplicable if people are incapable of exercising their rights. — Thomas Brand